bgware: relay-ctrl and rblsmtpd
Subject:
RE: [bgware] relay-ctrl and rblsmtpd
From:
Olivier Mueller ####@####.####
Date:
7 Apr 2008 08:26:08 -0000
Message-Id: <1207556666.28875.10.camel@olipc.insign.ch>
Hello,
On a specific server I need to use the same SMTP port for both incoming
mail and relaying traffic: is the solution below (from 2004) still the
"best" one, or is there a better/simpler solution now?
Regards & a nice week to you,
Olivier
On Fri, 2004-04-16 at 10:32 -0400, Joshua Nichols wrote:
> Charles Cazabon wrote:
> >> v3 doesn't rewrite the tcprules file at all. I don't think this is
> >> possible - or at least it won't be so straightforward.
> >
> > v3 still sets RELAYCLIENT using a program invoked before qmail-smtpd,
> > if I understand correctly. That program /should/ be able to also set
> > RBLSMTPD -- but if the current configuration syntax doesn't support
> > it, it should be very simple to add it in.
>
> After thoroughly rereading the man pages, I've determined that it is not
> possible from within relay-ctrl v3 without patching code. At this
> point, it seems that a better option is to add a script to the run file
> after relay-check, but before rblsmtpd.
>
> From a recent post by Charles to the qmail list:
>
> #!/bin/sh
> if env | grep -Eq '^RELAYCLIENT=' ; then
> RBLSMTPD=""
> export RBLSMTPD
> fi
> exec $@
>
> I am testing this now. I can't think of any circumstances in which
> RELAYCLIENT would be set, that one wouldn't want RBLSMTPD set, so I
> believe this will work well, and is version independent of relay-ctrl,
> and requires no patching.
>
>
> --joshua.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
> For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
>
